Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frances Tiafoe vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tiafoe vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Frances Tiafoe vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tiafoe 0 - 0 Medjedovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tiafoe has won 49.7% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 53.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tiafoe, in recent form, has won 45.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 50.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.16% and 32.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tiafoe has saved 58.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 57.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tiafoe has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Medjedovic winning 66.67% (W/L 34/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tiafoe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 112/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 49/ 43). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Tiafoe has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 10/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tiafoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 126.06 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 225.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tiafoe has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tiafoe has converted 39.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 45.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
26
Rank
10
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
134
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
59% (353-245)
Career Total W/L
63% (115-68)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
67% (10-5)
$6,904,325
Career Prize Money
$362,660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tiafoe VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frances Tiafoe | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 67% (10/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (24/26) | 63% (22/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (247/255) | 55% (181/150) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 82% (9/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 140 | 115 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:7 | 1:27:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 153.67 | 198.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (933/1593) | 63% (586/933) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (676/933) | 73% (428/586) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (328/660) | 54% (187/347) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (48/121) | 46% (42/92) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (562/1575) | 40% (382/961) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 78% (7/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 67% (10/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 50% (6/3) |
Frances Tiafoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Frances Tiafoe
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Frances Tiafoe
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Frances Tiafoe
64%
(
70 of
110)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
103)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Frances Tiafoe
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
11
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Luciano Darderi
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
James Duckworth
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Frances Tiafoe
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
17
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Frances Tiafoe
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Dusan Lajovic
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alexei Popyrin
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Laurent Lokoli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
20
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tiafoe Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Frances Tiafoe
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
